AI changed the rules.We build by the new rules.

We build complete B2B and B2C applications and systems. AI strengthens our team from workshop to launch. Your project is not passed between departments, and accountability never gets lost.

We build the entire product. You can try two of them now.

From user experience and business logic to data, integrations and deployment. We do not bolt on a single automation. We take responsibility for a working system.

Working products. No invented results that we did not measure.

Rader

B2B product · Next.js · catalogue · AI · 3D
Context
An extensive product range for a technical company.
What we built
A catalogue and product pages, an AI chatbot and 3D previews.
Responsibility
End-to-end design and implementation in Next.js.
Evidence
A public, working product available on the client's domain.
Open rader.com.pl
Home page of the Rader product websiteOpen the Rader website in a new tab
Rader product page with technical data
Product page: parameters and related product selection
Rader Assistant open next to the product catalogue
Rader Assistant: conversational product selection

Alufix

B2C product · Medusa.js · e-commerce
Context
An online store covering the complete purchase journey.
What we built
Catalogue and search, basket and checkout.
Responsibility
End-to-end design and implementation in Medusa.js.
Evidence
A public, complete e-commerce journey available on the client's domain.
Open alufix.pl
Home page of the Alufix online storeOpen the Alufix store in a new tab
Alufix catalogue with categories, filters and a product list
Catalogue: categories, filters and the complete range
Alufix basket with a product, order summary and checkout action
Basket: quantity, summary and checkout

Technology should fit the product. Not the other way around.

We most often build new products in the TypeScript ecosystem. We choose the framework, database and architecture for the product requirements and the client's environment. This is our core stack, not a closed catalogue.

  • React
  • Next.js
  • React Native
  • Expo
  • Node.js
  • NestJS
  • PostgreSQL
  • Medusa.js

Off-the-shelf software is cheaper until you count the whole cost.

Licence fees rise, integrations multiply, and the company starts working around the tool instead of with it. We compare the 24-month cost of an existing product with custom software and recommend the more sensible path.

Custom software wins when…

  • 24-month cost

    Licences, integrations, workarounds and missed opportunities begin to cost more than your own solution.

  • Product advantage

    The way the system works should differentiate the company, not copy a standard available to everyone.

  • Roles, data and integrations

    The solution must connect company-specific exceptions and existing systems into one flow.

  • Feedback-led development

    The direction will change as you learn from the rollout and user behaviour.

Not sure which side you are on? Let us check in 20 minutes.

See if it is worth building

You talk to the people who build your product.

No handovers between departments and no loss of context. The people in the workshop are also accountable for design, technology, implementation and deployment.

  1. We turn the workshop into a clear direction

    We structure the problem, users, constraints and one success criterion.

  2. We show the solution before you invest in all of it

    We create a flow, prototype, design and technical proof of concept that can be assessed in practice.

  3. We build working increments

    The same people keep the context through implementation, integrations and subsequent product decisions.

  4. A weak release does not go out

    Every release passes acceptance criteria, critical-path tests and an independent quality review.

AI increases speed. Accountability stays with us.

AI works with us at every stage. Product direction, acceptance criteria and the release decision remain ours.

AI supports

#NoAISlop

  1. Analysis
  2. Prototype
  3. Design
  4. Code
  5. Testing

We are accountable

  1. Product direction

    We define the problem, scope and one success criterion.

  2. Criteria and quality review

    Every increment passes acceptance criteria, critical-path tests and a review by a second expert.

  3. Release decision

    We make the release decision and remain accountable for its quality.

Accountability has real faces.

From the first conversation, you work directly with the founders accountable for product and technology.

Piotr Graczyk, CEO of Evelumo

Piotr Graczyk

CEO · Product strategy and collaboration

LinkedIn

He connects business goals, user experience and implementation. He makes sure that workshop decisions survive in the working product.

Paweł Stalęga, CTO of Evelumo

Paweł Stalęga

CTO · Technology and product development

LinkedIn

He connects architecture, backend and product development. He leads the independent quality review and makes sure every release meets the agreed criteria.

Do not invest months before you know whether the solution works.

In five days, we build a testable part of one critical path, check the biggest risk and give you a basis for the decision: buy, build or stop.

working
days

What we need: one critical path, a domain expert on your side and one success criterion.

  1. DeliverA working slice

    The real interface and logic of one critical path, ready to use and assess.

  2. TestThe biggest risk

    A data sample, integration test or mechanism on which the next investment depends.

  3. ProtectA quality gate

    Acceptance criteria, an automated critical-path test and a review by a second expert.

Decision Pack excerpt

An example structure. No client data.

Critical path

  1. 01InputData and starting conditions
  2. 02DecisionLogic and edge case
  3. 03OutcomeA result that can be assessed

Acceptance criterion

The user completes one agreed path, and the biggest risk has an outcome that can be verified.

  • happy path
  • edge case
  • failure mode

Evidence boundary

Confirms
the flow, logic and verification method
Does not confirm
production readiness of the entire product
After five daysA working slice, a tested risk and a first-release plan or an honest no-go.

buybuildstop

Duration
5 working days
Price
PLN 10,000 net
Moving to implementation
The full PLN 10,000 is deducted from a project above PLN 60,000 net

The Sprint is not a complete MVP or a production release. If it does not make sense, we will say so before it starts.

Check your scenario

Before you decide to build.

You do not need a finished brief, a chosen technology or a decision about the entire project.

Show us the problem. We will tell you what is worth doing next.

Before the call, we review the available information about your company and scenario. In 20 minutes, we identify the main constraint and a sensible next step: buy an existing product, build custom software or hold the investment.

30–60 min of preparation on our side20 min together on a call1 step a concrete recommendation for what to do next

What is not working as it should today?

After submitting, you can choose a time right away or ask for a reply without booking.

We will use your data only to respond to this enquiry. We will not add you to marketing without separate consent. We reply within one working day.